A Curious Comment was Made by jonathan Papelbon About aObama Depriving Them Of Our Gunsa When Questioned About The Boston Marathon

Ok people, letas decide to try an experiment here. May we've a rational debate about this tale without it devolving into conspiracy theories, particular attacks, partisan bickering and different interwebz junk? Most likely not, but oh well. Listed here is an interview Jonathan Papelbon, current Phillies closer, did with the Boston media recently in regards to the Boston Marathon. Papelbonas opinion is of note because he used to perform for the Red Sox and used to live near the site of the bombings. He was asked if, as a significant league baseball player in this day and age, he feels comfortable playing facing huge crowds. Here was his response (via 700Level.com ): Itas a shame, because he went on to state some good reasons for having Boston and reflection on his time there. Today, hereas where the experiment comes in: Can we all agree, regardless of your view on gun control, that aObama taking our gunsa (whicha okay, right, sorry, I wonat enter into it) was entirely unrelated to the topic at hand? That the supply (or lack thereof) of weapons had nothing to do with the bombings taking place? And that, eventually, the opinion was an unnecessary political dig? Should aObama using our gunsa be associated with the acrazya things going on in the planet? What do you think? [Deadspin]